A marketing team was paying every month for a stock photo subscription, plus per-picture licenses on top. We built a tool that reads their article and hands them an on-brand set in...
Every week, a marketing team publishes something worth reading. Every post needs three to six pictures. The current options each cost you something. Stock libraries are fast, but generic and shared with every competitor. A designer is on-brand, but their queue is three days deep. Chat-based AI tools are quick, but off-brand and spell your product name wrong.
Underneath all of it is the same recurring bill: a stock photo subscription that renews on autopilot every month, plus a per-picture license every time the plan does not have the right thing. It grows quietly as the team publishes more, and most teams stopped noticing years ago.
So we built the tool we wished existed. Paste a blog link, or drop in a Word file or PDF. The tool reads it, plans a set of pictures around what the article actually says, and hands you the whole set in about two minutes. In your brand colors. With no strange text inside them. And the monthly stock photos bill stops being needed at all.
So we built the tool we wished existed. Paste a blog link, or drop in a Word file or PDF. The tool reads it, plans a set of pictures around what the article actually says, and hands you the whole set in about two minutes. In your brand colors. With no strange text inside them. Fix one without redoing the rest.
"A good picture starts with reading the article. Most tools skip that step."
The idea behind this build
This is not one more chat tool to open. It changes how pictures get made in a marketing team: who is on the critical path, how long each post waits, and what the pictures have to do with the article they sit next to. The points below come from the live demo, so you can try it on your own blog and see for yourself.
Four steps, on your terms. The whole flow takes about two minutes. Your team learns it in one try, then never has to think about it again.
Or drop in a PDF, a Word file, or a plain-text brief. Anything your team already writes goes in. Nothing else to fill in.
The tool reads what you gave it, ignores menus and ads, and plans a set of picture ideas that match your article's actual points, not generic ideas about the topic.
Three or six pictures arrive at once, using your brand colors, with no text inside them. Six pictures in about the same time as one.
If one picture is off, tell the tool what to change and only that one is re-done. The other five stay approved. Download the set and publish.
Paste a topic into a public chat tool and you get a generic picture, disconnected from what you actually wrote. It never reads your article, never keeps your brand, and forgets everything by tomorrow. The difference is not the model. It is that this one reads your content and follows your rules.
A chat tool only sees the sentence you type. This reads the whole article and plans pictures around the specific examples in it, not around generic ideas of the topic. The writer does not have to turn their own post into a clever prompt. They just paste the link.
The biggest reason marketing teams give up on AI pictures is misspelled words rendered into the image. This tool blocks that at the source. If a picture concept would need text on it, the tool re-plans it. If you want a headline on the image, you add it later in your normal design tool, crisply.
Three or six pictures come back together, in about the same time as one. You are not clicking Regenerate over and over. The set is planned as a set, so the pictures work together on the same post: header, inline images, email header.
Five pictures land right. One is too dark. Click Tweak on that one, type "brighter, warmer light", and only that picture is re-made. The other five stay exactly as you approved them. No paying for six new pictures to fix one, and no drift on the ones that already worked.
Your brand colors, your picture sizes, your allowed and blocked subjects, your mood keywords: all of it sits in one settings screen the tool reads before every run. Nobody types a brand-guide paragraph into every prompt. Nobody sends off-brand pictures by mistake.
Three pictures for a short blog post. Six for a long article or when you also need social versions. One dial, sensible defaults, no configuration to memorise. The team picks the count that matches the post and the tool does the rest.
A blog link, a PDF, a Word file, or a plain-text brief. Whatever your team already writes goes in. In your version, we can connect the tool to Notion or Google Docs so nobody has to copy and paste. The source of the writing decides nothing about the pictures the tool can make.
From pasting the link to downloading the set: about two minutes. The tool makes the pictures in parallel, not one after the other, so a set of six lands in roughly the same time as a set of one. No hourglass to watch. No coffee break to plan around it.
The pictures do not sit in another folder nobody opens. In your version, they can drop straight into your CMS, your Google Drive folder for the week's posts, or the shared inbox your social team pulls from. The pictures land where the next step happens.
Most marketing teams pay for a stock photo subscription every month, plus per-picture licenses on top when the plan does not have the right thing. A recurring bill that only grows as the team publishes more. This tool replaces it. The subscription does not renew. The per-picture licenses stop being needed. The picture line on the budget shrinks.
Pictures are one job. The way this tool works (read what you give it, plan what to make, make it) is the same way every custom AI tool we build works. Swap the reader and the maker and the same shape helps support, finance, onboarding, or any team that starts with reading and ends with an output.
This is the moment the whole approach earns its keep. A chat tool sees a five-word topic and returns a stock-looking scene. This tool reads the actual article, notices the specific examples in it, and plans the pictures around those.
Every marketing team that tries AI pictures runs into the same wall. The tool tries to write your product name inside the image and gets the letters wrong. Charts have gibberish axis labels. Screens show mangled words. You end up hunting for the one usable picture out of six.
Most tools force a full re-run for any change. You end up paying for six new pictures to fix one, and the other five drift too. Now the set no longer feels cohesive. Now the writer is back to square one.
Chat tools forget your brand the moment you close the window. Marketers copy-paste a brand paragraph into every prompt, and even then the pictures come back inconsistent. Different team members get different results from the same tool.
The set is made together, not one after the other. That is why six pictures land in roughly the same time as one. Your team is not sitting through a hourglass six times over. The set is planned as a set, so the pictures also hang together as a group.
Most marketing teams pay for a stock photo subscription every month. It got signed years ago. It has been renewing on autopilot ever since, whether the team uses it much or not. On top of that, per-picture licenses get added every time the plan does not have the right thing. Together, that recurring picture bill only grows as the team publishes more.
The way this tool works (read what you give it, plan what to make, make it) is the same way every custom AI tool we build works. Pictures are one job. The same shape helps support, finance, onboarding, or any team whose work starts with reading and ends with a specific output.
The public demo runs on your blog link and your uploaded files. A custom build connects the tool to the systems your team already uses, so pictures land where the next step happens, not in another folder someone has to remember to check.
Your content and your brand rules sit at the center. Every step is small and clear, and you can change what happens at any layer without rewriting the rest.
Your writing tools connect once. Nothing is exported by hand, nothing is copy-pasted, and the source of truth stays where your writers already work.
The marketer sees "paste link, click, wait, review". Underneath, four small steps make the output land right.
The live demo proves the loop on any URL you paste. A real build starts with the tool wired into where your team already writes, then adds the outputs your marketing team actually needs.
Paste any blog link or upload a file. Get three or six pictures back in about two minutes. See how close it lands on your brand out of the box.
Fix one picture without redoing the rest. Type the adjustment in plain English. The other five stay approved.
The planner rejects text-heavy concepts. Every picture-making call carries the no-text-in-image constraint. Nothing to hunt through.
Wire in your CMS, Google Docs, or Notion. The tool reads directly from where your writers already work, no copy-pasting.
Drop the set straight into your CMS draft, Google Drive folder, or scheduler. The pictures never travel through email.
Beyond pictures. Turn tickets into reply drafts, invoices into to-do lists, product docs into email series. One custom workflow at a time.
Open the demo, paste a link from your blog, and watch the tool read the article and hand you a set of pictures in about two minutes. Then tell us the job your team spends hours on every week, and we plan the custom workflow around it.
We built this for Entexis. We can build it for you, same rigour, your domain.
No spam. Just a conversation about your project.
Hope that was helpful. Reach out anytime.